« The Beautiful Games Begin! | Main | A Hindu Rate of Growth »


China and Proxy Wars


Was thinking over my Flashpoint 2012 theory this morning, and lo and behold this pops up on the BBC.


The actual Amnesty report is here, and it merely confirms what we already know. In Sudan, Burma and Nepal, China has been a significant supplier of arms to unsavoury regimes.


Amnesty's naivety is almost touching:


"We're calling for China to enact into law and uphold commitments... banning all arms transfers where they are likely to be used for human rights violations," Ms Hughes said.


Yeah, as if. China itself is one of the world's biggest human rights violators, and reneges on a number of international treaties from the WTO to the UN Charter.


Now, this is not to say that China is not doing anything the US isn't doing. In fact the US is doing the very same thing a hundred times over, if not a thousand.


But the point is that China is selling arms to protect its interests. Oil in Sudan and Iran; oil supply routes and logging with Myanmar; and strategic positioning over India and Tibet in Nepal. That's the nub of things.


There's also various conflicts in Pakistan and India, in which China, energy resources and Maoism are all somehow mixed up. Pipelines were recently blown in up in both Baluchistan and in Assam.


Coming soon: a full explanation of Flashpoint 2012 theory. Watch this space. BBC report below.


Update - 17 June 2006 BBC Analysis here.

China arms sales 'fuel conflicts'


The human rights organisation Amnesty International has accused China of being one of the world's most secretive and irresponsible arms exporters.


It says Chinese weapons helped fuel conflicts in Sudan, Burma and Nepal.


Amnesty urged China to stop exports that could be used for human rights violations, and to publish information on its arms exports.


China rejected the accusations, insisting it had strict safeguards to prevent any unethical sales of weapons.


Amnesty challenged these safeguards in its report.


"China describes its approach to arms export licensing as 'cautious and responsible', yet the reality couldn't be further from the truth," the author's report, Helen Hughes, said in a statement.


"China is the only major arms exporting power that has not signed up to any multilateral agreements with criteria to prevent arms exports likely to be used for serious human rights violations."


The report alleges that in 2005, Beijing shipped 200 Chinese military trucks to Sudan and that it is supplying the ruling military junta in Burma with weapons.


China rarely comments on its arms exports, though it is one of the junta's few firm allies.


The report also accuses China of selling rifles and grenades to Nepal's security forces at a time when there was a mass uprising against the monarchy by civilians.


The report says China exports more than $1bn worth of weapons a year, often exchanging arms for raw materials needed to fuel its economy.


Amnesty urges China to change its current practices to be more transparent and to support the international initiative for an arms trade treaty.


"We're calling for China to enact into law and uphold commitments... banning all arms transfers where they are likely to be used for human rights violations," Ms Hughes said.


China has long said it had a careful approach to weapons sales, only issuing licences after examining each application individually.


The focus on its arms exports comes amid US concerns that China's military spending is growing much more quickly than it officially acknowledges.


China has also been actively campaigning the European Union to lift its ban on weapons sales to China, imposed following the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.philip-sen.com/cgi-bin/mt2/mt-tb.cgi/183

Comments



Hey Philip, it seems like China has a very suspicious game plan at the moment.


Look at the way they have actively courted rogue states and those who the US and EU will not deal with. Witness cosying up to Mugabe, wooing some of the former Soviet states, and of course getting on side with the SPDC in Burma.


They've sensed an opportunity to increase their global impact, and without any interest in human rights or democracy there is pretty much no one who is beyond the bounds of a positive bilateral relationship.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)








Visits to www.philip-sen.com


Locations of visitors to this page

Sitemeter



Links


Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Powered by
Movable Type 4.01